4.7 Article

Canonical BMP signaling is dispensable for hematopoietic stem cell function in both adult and fetal liver hematopoiesis, but essential to preserve colon architecture

期刊

BLOOD
卷 115, 期 23, 页码 4689-4698

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-05-220988

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Cancer Society
  2. European Commission
  3. Swedish Research Council
  4. Swedish Children Cancer Foundation
  5. Lund University Hospital
  6. European Union [T-Angiovasc QLG1-CT-2001-01032]
  7. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (Center of Excellence grant in life sciences)
  8. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Numerous publications have described the importance of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling in the specification of hematopoietic tissue in developing embryos. Here we investigate the full role of canonical BMP signaling in both adult and fetal liver hematopoiesis using conditional knockout strategies because conventional disruption of components of the BMP signaling pathway result in early death of the embryo. By targeting both Smad1 and Smad5, we have generated a double-knockout mouse with complete disruption of canonical BMP signaling. Interestingly, concurrent deletion of Smad1 and Smad5 results in death because of extrahematopoietic pathologic changes in the colon. However, Smad1/Smad5-deficient bone marrow cells can compete normally with wild-type cells and display unaffected self-renewal and differentiation capacity when transplanted into lethally irradiated recipients. Moreover, although BMP receptor expression is increased in fetal liver, fetal liver cells deficient in both Smad1 and Smad5 remain competent to long-term reconstitute lethally irradiated recipients in a multilineage manner. In conclusion, canonical BMP signaling is not required to maintain either adult or fetal liver hematopoiesis, despite its crucial role in the initial patterning of hematopoiesis in early embryonic development. (Blood. 2010;115(23):4689-4698)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据