4.1 Article

Cognitive-motor dysfunction after severe traumatic brain injury: A cerebral interhemispheric disconnection syndrome

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2015.1077930

关键词

Ideomotor apraxia; Action-intention; Traumatic brain injury; Limb kinetic apraxia; Corpus callosum

资金

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Rehabilitation Research and Development as a Career Development Award 1 [1 IK1 RX000961-01A1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Objectives: In most right-handed people, the left hemisphere is dominant for programming the temporal and spatial how (praxis) aspects of purposeful skilled movements, and the right hemisphere is dominant for control of the intentional when aspects of actions that mediate initiation, persistence, termination, and inhibition. Since the interhemispheric axons of the corpus callosum are especially susceptible to shearing from torsional forces during traumatic brain injury (TBI), the goal of this study was to learn whether participants with a history of severe traumatic brain injury demonstrate three types of cognitive-motor impairments that may result from callosal injury: ideomotor apraxia of the left hand, limb kinetic apraxia of the left hand, and hypokinesia of the right hand in response to left hemispatial stimuli. Method: Nine participants with severe TBI and nine healthy control participants were studied for the presence of ideomotor apraxia, limb kinetic apraxia, and hypokinesia. Results: When compared to the control participants, the participants with TBI revealed ideomotor apraxia and limb kinetic apraxia of the left hand and hypokinesia in response to left-sided visual stimuli when tested with the right hand. Conclusions: TBI appears to cause unilateral disorders of cognitive-motor functions. Future research is needed to understand how these cognitive-motor disorders are related to interhemispheric disconnection most likely induced by injury to the corpus callosum.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据