4.7 Article

DNA vaccination induces WT1-specific T-cell responses with potential clinical relevance

期刊

BLOOD
卷 112, 期 7, 页码 2956-2964

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-02-137695

关键词

-

资金

  1. French Association for Cancer Research [3257]
  2. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale
  3. Leukemia Research Fund [0306]
  4. Cancer Research UK [C7643/A3748]
  5. Medical Research Council [G0700149] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. MRC [G0700149] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Wilms tumor antigen, WT1, is associated with several human cancers, including leukemia. We evaluated WT1 as an immunotherapeutic target using our proven DNA fusion vaccine design, p.DOM-peptide, encoding a minimal tumor-derived major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I-binding epitope downstream of a foreign sequence of tetanus toxin. Three p.DOM-peptide vaccines, each encoding a different WT1-derived, HLA-A2-restricted epitope, induced cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) in humanized transgenic mice expressing chimeric HLA-A2, without affecting hematopoietic stem cells. Mouse CTLs killed human leukemia cells in vitro, indicating peptide processing/presentation. Low numbers of T cells specific for these epitopes have been described in cancer patients. Expanded human T cells specific for each epitope were lytic in vitro. Focusing on human WT1(37-45)-specific cells, the most avid of the murine responses, we demonstrated lysis of primary leukemias, underscoring their clinical relevance. Finally, we showed that these human CTL kill target cells transfected with the relevant p.DOM-peptide DNA vaccine, confirming that WT1-derived epitopes are presented to T cells similarly by tumors and following DNA vaccination. Together, these data link mouse and human studies to suggest that rationally designed DNA vaccines encoding WT1-derived epitopes, particularly WT1(37-45), have the potential to induce/expand functional tumor-specific cytotoxic responses in cancer patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据