Analysis of outcomes after radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance (PRIAS)

Age-adjusted validation of the most stringent criteria for active surveillance in low-risk prostate cancer patients

(2011) Nazareno Suardi et al.   CANCER

The Contemporary Concept of Significant Versus Insignificant Prostate Cancer

(2011) Guillaume Ploussard et al.   EUROPEAN UROLOGY

Predictors of Unfavourable Repeat Biopsy Results in Men Participating in a Prospective Active Surveillance Program

(2011) Meelan Bul et al.   EUROPEAN UROLOGY

Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Progress and Promise

(2011) Matthew R. Cooperberg et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY

Active Surveillance Program for Prostate Cancer: An Update of the Johns Hopkins Experience

(2011) Jeffrey J. Tosoian et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY

Surgical management after active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: pathological outcomes compared with men undergoing immediate treatment

(2010) Marc A. Dall’Era et al.   BJU INTERNATIONAL

Careful Selection and Close Monitoring of Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients on Active Surveillance Minimizes the Need for Treatment

(2010) Mark S. Soloway et al.   EUROPEAN UROLOGY

Biochemical Recurrence Following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Analysis of 1384 Patients with a Median 5-year Follow-up

(2010) Mani Menon et al.   EUROPEAN UROLOGY

Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Versus Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Comparison of Short-Term Biochemical Recurrence-Free Survival

(2010) Daniel A. Barocas et al.   JOURNAL OF UROLOGY

Focal Positive Surgical Margins Decrease Disease-free Survival After Radical Prostatectomy Even in Organ-confined Disease

(2010) Alison M. Lake et al.   UROLOGY

Pathologic Outcomes of Candidates for Active Surveillance Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

(2010) Patrick Mufarrij et al.   UROLOGY

Testing the most stringent criteria for selection of candidates for active surveillance in patients with low-risk prostate cancer

(2009) Nazareno Suardi et al.   BJU INTERNATIONAL

Application of the Epstein criteria for prediction of clinically insignificant prostate cancer in Korean men

(2009) Sang E. Lee et al.   BJU INTERNATIONAL

Disease insight and treatment perception of men on active surveillance for early prostate cancer

(2009) Roderick C.N. van den Bergh et al.   BJU INTERNATIONAL

Short-term outcomes of the prospective multicentre ‘Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance’ study

(2009) Roderick C.N. van den Bergh et al.   BJU INTERNATIONAL

The Role of Biopsy Core Number in Selecting Prostate Cancer Patients for Active Surveillance

(2009) Guillaume Ploussard et al.   EUROPEAN UROLOGY

Clinical Results of Long-Term Follow-Up of a Large, Active Surveillance Cohort With Localized Prostate Cancer

(2009) Laurence Klotz et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY

Pathological Outcomes of Candidates for Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer

(2009) Simon L. Conti et al.   JOURNAL OF UROLOGY

Treatment Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy in Potential Candidates for 3 Published Active Surveillance Protocols

(2009) C. Shad Thaxton et al.   UROLOGY

Percent Tumor Involvement and Risk of Biochemical Progression After Radical Prostatectomy

(2008) Edward N. Rampersaud et al.   JOURNAL OF UROLOGY

Pathological Upgrading and Up Staging With Immediate Repeat Biopsy in Patients Eligible for Active Surveillance

(2008) Ryan K. Berglund et al.   JOURNAL OF UROLOGY

Screen detected, low volume prostate cancer: The case for active treatment

(2008) James E. Montie   UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS

Validation of the Contemporary Epstein Criteria for Insignificant Prostate Cancer in European Men

(2007) Claudio Jeldres et al.   EUROPEAN UROLOGY