3.8 Article

Epigenetic Control of Embryonic Renal Cell Differentiation by L1 Retrotransposon

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bdra.20786

关键词

5 ' untranslated region; benzo(a) pyrene (BaP); histone acetylation; histone methylation; long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1 or L1); nephrogenesis; polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs); Wilms' Tumor suppressor (WT1)

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH, USA) [5R01 ES004849, ES014443]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: L1 retroelements may play a central role in morphogenesis through epigenetic mechanisms involving recruitment of chromatin modifying protein complexes. Retroelements are repressed in terminally differentiated cells, and highly active in embryonic, undifferentiated, and transformed cells. It is not clear if the modulation of differentiation by L1 is a cause or effect. The purpose of this study was to determine if murine embryonic kidney cells of clonal origin (mK4 cells) harbor retrotransposition events upon ectopic expression of L1, and the impact of L1 on embryonic kidney cell differentiation. Given that L1 is reactivated by aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) ligands, we also sought to investigate the effects of benzo(a) pyrene (BaP) and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) on the genetic network of mK4 cells. METHODS: The mK4 cells overexpressing human L1(RP) were assessed for changes in proliferation and expression of molecular markers of cellular differentiation. RESULTS: L1(RP) increased proliferation rates and markedly downregulated differentiation programming in mK4 cells. These genetic alterations were recapitulated by exogenous activation of L1 by AHR ligands. CONCLUSION: L1 regulates nephrogenesis in vitro via both insertional and non-insertional mechanisms that disrupt mesenchymal to epithelial transition. Thus, a feedback loop involving L1, WT1, and AHR may play a role in regulation of kidney morphogenesis. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 91:693-702, 2011. (C) 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据