4.4 Article

The association of the effect of lithium in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder with lithium plasma levels: a post hoc analysis of a double-blind study comparing switching to lithium or placebo in patients who responded to quetiapine (Trial 144)

期刊

BIPOLAR DISORDERS
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 100-109

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12027

关键词

bipolar disorder; lithium; maintenance treatment; placebo; plasma levels

资金

  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals [D1447C00144]
  2. AstraZeneca
  3. Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development
  4. European Union
  5. Stanley Medical Research Institute
  6. Eli Lilly Co.
  7. GlaxoSmithKline
  8. Wyeth
  9. Pfizer
  10. Servier
  11. National Institute of Mental Health
  12. Abbott
  13. Biovail
  14. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  15. Burroughs Wellcome
  16. Cenerx
  17. Cephalon
  18. Ciba Geigy
  19. CoMentis
  20. Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma America
  21. Eisai
  22. Forest
  23. Janssen
  24. Johnson Johnson
  25. Lundbeck
  26. McNeil Pharmaceuticals
  27. Medicinova
  28. Merck
  29. Neurochem
  30. New River Pharmaceuticals
  31. Novartis
  32. Organon
  33. Pharmacia
  34. Repligen
  35. Saegis
  36. Sandoz
  37. Sanofi
  38. Sanofi-Synthelabo
  39. Schwabe/Ingenix
  40. Sepracor
  41. Shire
  42. Sunovion
  43. Synaptic
  44. Takeda
  45. TAP
  46. Transcept Pharma
  47. TransTech
  48. UCB Pharma
  49. Vela

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nolen WA, Weisler RH. The association of the effect of lithium in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder with lithium plasma levels: a post hoc analysis of a double-blind study comparing switching to lithium or placebo in patients who responded to quetiapine (Trial 144). Bipolar Disord 2012: 15: 100-109. (C) 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Objectives: There is no robust proof that the efficacy of lithium in the prevention of manic and depressive episodes in bipolar disorder depends on its plasma level. This analysis aimed to compare the effect of lithium within the presumed therapeutic range of 0.61.2 mEq/L and below 0.6 mEq/L with that of placebo. Methods: We carried out a post hoc analysis of a double-blind trial in which patients aged >= 18 years with bipolar I disorder (DSM-IV) who had achieved stabilization from a manic, depressive, or mixed episode during open-label treatment with quetiapine were randomized to continue quetiapine or to switch to lithium or placebo for up to 104 weeks. Of patients randomized to lithium, 201 obtained median lithium levels between 0.6 and 1.2 mEq/L, and 137 obtained median lithium levels <0.6 mEq/L. Their outcomes were compared with those of patients receiving placebo (n = 404). The primary outcome was time to recurrence of any mood event; additional outcomes included time to recurrence of a manic or depressive event. Results: Times to recurrence of any mood event as well as a manic or depressive event were significantly longer for the lithium 0.61.2 mEq/L group versus placebo and versus lithium <0.6 mEq/L, with no differences between lithium <0.6 mEq/L and placebo. Conclusions: The results support and expand previous findings that lithium should be dosed high enough to achieve plasma levels =0.6 mEq/L in order to achieve an effect in the prevention of both manic and depressive recurrences of bipolar I disorder. A major limitation is that the composition of the two lithium groups was not based on randomization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据