4.3 Article

Optimization of Five Environmental Factors to Increase Beta-Propeller Phytase Production in Pichia pastoris and Impact on the Physiological Response of the Host

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS
卷 29, 期 6, 页码 1377-1385

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.1822

关键词

Pichia pastoris; beta-propeller phytase; Simplex optimization method; physiological response

资金

  1. Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon [CN1555-07, IT583-10]
  2. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACYT) [02141-03, 156719-10]
  3. CONACYT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, we engineered Pichia pastoris Mut(s) strains to produce several beta-propeller phytases, one from Bacillus subtilis and the others designed by a structure-guided consensus approach. Furthermore, we demonstrated the ability of P. pastoris to produce and secrete these phytases in an active form in shake-flask cultures. In the present work, we used a design of experiments strategy (Simplex optimization method) to optimize five environmental factors that define the culture conditions in the induction step to increase beta-propeller phytase production in P. pastoris bioreactor cultures. With the optimization process, up to 347,682 U (82,814 U/L or 6.4 g/L culture medium) of phytase at 68 h of induction was achieved. In addition, the impact of the optimization process on the physiological response of the host was evaluated. The results indicate that the increase in extracellular phytase production through the optimization process was correlated with an increase in metabolic activity of P. pastoris, shown by an increase in oxygen demand and methanol consumption, that increase the specific growth rate. The increase in extracellular phytase production also occurred with a decrease in extracellular protease activity. Moreover, the optimized culture conditions increased the recombinant protein secretion by up to 88%, along with the extracellular phytase production efficiency per cell. (c) 2013 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 29:1377-1385, 2013

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据