4.3 Article

Identification of Cellular Objective for Elucidating the Physiological State of Plasmid-Bearing Escherichia coli Using Genome-Scale In Silico Analysis

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 61-67

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.51

关键词

constraint-based flux analysis; metabolic burden; genome-scale in silico model; plasmid-bearing Escherichia coli; ATP maintenance energy; cellular objective

资金

  1. Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The presence of multiple copies of plasmids in Escherichia coli could induce a complex cascade of physiological changes known as the metabolic burden response. In this work, the physiological effect of such plasmid metabolic burden on E. coli metabolism was investigated by constraint-based genome-scale flux modeling. We systematically applied three cellular objectives: (a) maximizing growth rate, (b) maximizing plasmid production, and (c) maximizing maintenance energy expenditure to quantify in silico flux distributions. These simulated results were compared with experimental flux information to identify which of these cellular objectives best describes the physiological and metabolic states of plasmid-bearing (P+) E. coli. Unlike the wild-type E. coli cells that have directed the metabolism toward an optimum growth I-ate under the nutrient-limited condition, the maximum growth rate objective could not correctly predict the metabolic state Of recombinant P+ cells. Instead, flux simulations by maximizing maintenance energy expenditure showed good consistency with experimental observation, indicating that the P+ cells are energetically less efficient and could require higher maintenance energy. This study demonstrates that the cellular objective of maximizing maintenance energy expenditure provides a better description of the underlying physiological state in recombinant microorganisms relevant to biotechnological applications. (C) 2008 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 25: 61-67, 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据