4.5 Article

A comprehensive quantification method for eicosanoids and related compounds by using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry with high speed continuous ionization polarity switching

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2015.05.015

关键词

Eicosanoid; Lipid mediator; Quantification; LC-MS; Lipidomics

资金

  1. MEXT KAKENHI [25116707, 24229003]
  2. Takeda Science Foundation
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25116707] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fatty acids and related metabolites, comprising several hundreds of molecular species, are an important target in disease metabolomics, as they are involved in various mammalian pathologies and physiologies. Selected reaction monitoring (SRM) analysis, which is capable of monitoring hundreds of compounds in a single run, has been widely used for comprehensive quantification. However, it is difficult to monitor a large number of compounds with different ionization polarity, as polarity switching requires a sub-second period per cycle in classical mass spectrometers. In the present study, we developed and evaluated a comprehensive quantification method for eicosanoids and related compounds by using LC/MS with high-speed continuous ionization polarity switching. The new method employs a fast (30 ms/cycle) continuous ionization polarity switching, and differentiates 137 targets either by chromatography or by SRM transition. Polarity switching did not affect the lower limits of quantification, which ranged similarly from 0.5 to 200 pg on column. Lipid extracts from mouse tissues were analyzed by this method, and 65 targets were quantitatively detected in the brain, including 6 compounds analyzed in the positive ion mode. We demonstrated that a fast continuous ionization polarity switching enables the quantification of amide variety of lipid mediator species without compromising the sensitivity and reliability. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据