4.3 Article

Tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae K35 to Lignocellulose-derived Inhibitory Compounds

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOPROCESS ENGINEERING
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 755-760

出版社

KOREAN SOC BIOTECHNOLOGY & BIOENGINEERING
DOI: 10.1007/s12257-010-0474-4

关键词

Saccharomyces cerevisiae; ethanol; lignocelluloses; inhibitor; hydrolysate

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2010-0002313]
  2. Kwangwoon University
  3. Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Korea [309016-5]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0002313] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hydrolysis which converts polysaccharides to the fermentable sugars for yeast's lingocellulosic ethanol production also generates byproducts which inhibit the ethanol production. To investigate the extent to which inhibitory compounds affect yeast's growth and ethanol production, fermentations by Saccharomyces cerevisiae K35 were investigated in various concentrations of acetic acid, furfural, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF), syringaldehyde, and coumaric acid. Fermentation in hydrolysates from yellow poplar and waste wood was also studied. After 24 h, S. cerevisiae K35 produced close to theoretically predicted ethanol yields in all the concentrations of acetic acid tested (1 similar to 10 g/L). Both furans and phenolics inhibited cell growth and ethanol production. Ethanol yield, however, was unaffected, even at high concentrations, except in the cases of 5 g/L of syringaldehyde and coumaric acid. Although hydrolysates contain various toxic compounds, in their presence, S. cerevisiae K35 consumed close to all the available glucose and yielded more ethanol than theoretically predicted. S. cerevisiae K35 was demonstrated to have high tolerance to inhibitory compounds and not to need any detoxification for ethanol production from hydrolysates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据