4.6 Review

Critical review of activated sludge modeling: State of process knowledge, modeling concepts, and limitations

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
卷 110, 期 1, 页码 24-46

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/bit.24624

关键词

ASM; biological nutrient removal; modeling concepts; model selection

资金

  1. IWA
  2. Black Veatch
  3. Irstea
  4. EnviroSim Associates Ltd.
  5. Kurita Water Industries Ltd.
  6. TU Vienna
  7. BOKU Vienna
  8. Universite Laval
  9. Ecole Polytechnique of Montreal
  10. EAWAG
  11. Hydromantis Environmental Software Solutions, Inc.
  12. MOSTforWATER N.V.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work critically reviews modeling concepts for standard activated sludge wastewater treatment processes (e.g., hydrolysis, growth and decay of organisms, etc.) for some of the most commonly used models. Based on a short overview on the theoretical biochemistry knowledge this review should help model users to better understand (i) the model concepts used; (ii) the differences between models, and (iii) the limits of the models. The seven analyzed models are: (1) ASM1; (2) ASM2d; (3) ASM3; (4) ASM3?+?BioP; (5) ASM2d?+?TUD; (6) Barker & Dold model; and (7) UCTPHO+. Nine standard processes are distinguished and discussed in the present work: hydrolysis; fermentation; ordinary heterotrophic organisms (OHO) growth; autotrophic nitrifying organisms (ANO) growth; OHO & ANO decay; poly-hydroxyalkanoates (PHA) storage; polyphosphate (polyP) storage; phosphorus accumulating organisms PAO) growth; and PAO decay. For a structured comparison, a new schematic representation of these processes is proposed. Each process is represented as a reaction with consumed components on the left of the figure and produced components on the right. Standardized icons, based on shapes and color codes, enable the representation of the stoichiometric modeling concepts and kinetics. This representation allows highlighting the conceptual differences of the models, and the level of simplification between the concepts and the theoretical knowledge. The model selection depending on their theoretical limitations and the main research needs to increase the model quality are finally discussed. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2013; 110: 2446. (C) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据