4.6 Article

Degradation of reactive dyes in a photocatalytic circulating-bed biofilm reactor

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
卷 109, 期 4, 页码 884-893

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/bit.24366

关键词

reactive dyes; biofilm; intimate coupling; photocatalysis; biodegradation

资金

  1. US national Science Foundation [0651794]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [0651794] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Decolorization and mineralization of reactive dyes by intimately coupled TiO2-photocatalysis and biodegradation (ICPB) on a novel TiO2-coated biofilm carrier were investigated in a photocatalytic circulating-bed biofilm reactor (PCBBR). Two typical reactive dyesReactive Black 5 (RB5) and Reactive Yellow 86 (RY86)showed similar first-order kinetics when being photocatalytically decolorized at low pH (similar to 45) in batch experiments. Photocatalytic decolorization was inhibited at neutral pH in the presence of phosphate or carbonate buffer, presumably due to electrostatic repulsion from negatively charged surface sites on TiO2, radical scavenging by phosphate or carbonate, or both. Therefore, continuous PCBBR experiments were carried out at a low pH (similar to 4.5) to maintain high photocatalytic efficiency. In the PCBBR, photocatalysis alone with TiO2-coated carriers could remove target compound RB5 and COD by 97% and 47%, respectively. Addition of biofilm inside macroporous carriers maintained a similar RB5 removal efficiency, but COD removal increased to 65%, which is evidence of ICPB despite the low pH. ICPB was further proven by finding microorganisms inside carriers at the end of the PCBBR experiments. A proposed ICPB pathway for RB5 suggests that a major intermediate, a naphthol derivative, was responsible for most of the residual COD, while most of the nitrogen in the azo-bonds (?N?N?) was oxidized to N2. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012; 109:884893. (c) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据