4.6 Article

A Comparative Study of Activity and Apparent Inhibition of Fungal β-Glucosidases

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
卷 107, 期 6, 页码 943-952

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.22885

关键词

isothermal titration calorimetry; beta-glucosidase; apparent glucose (product) inhibition

资金

  1. Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation [2104-07-0028]
  2. Department of Energy [DE-FC36-08GO18080]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

beta-Glucosidases (BGs) from Aspergillus fumigates, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus oryzae, Chaetomium globosum, Emericella nidulans, Magnaporthe grisea, Neurospora crassa, and Penicillium brasilianum were purified to homogeneity, and analyzed by isothermal titration calorimetry with respect to their hydrolytic activity and its sensitivity to glucose (product) using cellobiose as substrate. Global non-linear regression of several reactions, with or without added glucose, to a product inhibition equation enabled the concurrent derivation of the kinetic parameters k(cat), K-m, and the apparent product inhibition constant K-app(i) for each of the enzymes. A more simple fit is not advisable to use as the determined K-app(i) are in the same range as their K-m for some of the tested BGs and produced glucose would in these cases interfere. The highest value for k(cat) was determined for A. fumigatus (768 s(-1)) and the lowest was a factor 9 less. K-m varied by a factor of 3 with the lowest value determined for C. globosum (0.95 mM). The measured K-app(i) varied a factor of 15; the hydrolytic activity of N. crassa being the most resistant to glucose with an apparent product inhibition constant of 10.1 mM. Determination of K-app(i) using cellobiose as substrate is important as it reflects to what extent the different BGs are hydrolytically active under industrial conditions where natural substrates are hydrolyzed and the final glucose concentrations are high. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010;107: 943-952. (C) 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据