4.7 Article

Field trials of the Natural Ventilation Augmented Cooling (NVAC) greenhouse

期刊

BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING
卷 174, 期 -, 页码 159-172

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2018.07.004

关键词

Greenhouse design; Misting; Natural ventilation; Arid; Tropical climate

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [355743-13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many greenhouse designs rely solely on natural ventilation, which makes them suitable for use in mild climates or for the production of heat-tolerant crops. The Natural Ventilation Augmented Cooling (NVAC) greenhouse is naturally ventilated and improved by augmenting the thermal buoyancy with a strategically placed misting system. The greenhouse structure comprises tall sidewalls, oversized side vents, a roof vent, and an additional inside roof. The misting system is located above the gutter level of the greenhouse and sprays a mist of water between the top roof and the added inside roof. The added roof guides the cooled air towards the main space of the greenhouse and prevents water droplets from reaching the crop. Testing was performed in Trents, Barbados, where an empty NVAC greenhouse (without plants) provided cooling ranging from 1.3 to 3.6 degrees C relative to outside temperatures, while increasing relative humidity by 5.7-17.7%. This is in contrast to inside temperatures being warmer than outside temperatures in most natural ventilation greenhouses. The NVAC greenhouse is an affordable design, using far less electricity than a pad and fan system in a comparably sized greenhouse. The NVAC misting system can be used intermittently or continuously to reduce greenhouse temperatures year-round or to extend growing seasons. Site-specific conditions such as natural variations in weather must be considered as they play a role in the performance of the NVAC greenhouse. Accordingly, an automation system can help improve usage. (C) 2018 IAgrE. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据