4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Influence of foliage on radio path losses (PLs) for wireless sensor network (WSN) planning in orchards

期刊

BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING
卷 114, 期 4, 页码 454-465

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2012.08.011

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Radio propagation within a plum orchard was investigated using ZigBee devices operating within the 2.4 GHz band. Measurements were performed to estimate power attenuation due to the presence of trees and their foliage. Radio path loss (PL) measurements, with and without leaves, revealed that at antennas heights close to the tree tops the PL was not affected significantly by the presence of tree leaves, mainly because of diffraction from the tree canopy air interface, which provided an additional propagation mode. At antenna heights where foliage takes up a significant portion of the propagation path the attenuation was increased in the presence of leaves. However, at 2.4 GHz this effect was not severe mainly because the corresponding wavelength is greater than the average leaf size of the plum tree. An approach was carried out to characterise empirical data by means of established vegetation-attenuation models. The most accurate model for the particular orchard layout was the parametric exponential decay (PED) model using parameters best-fitted to the measurements, whereas the second-best was the standard Weissberger exponential decay model, which does not require any parameter fitting. Also, several standard exponential decay models which have been developed for forest environments can be used as 'conservative' upper bounds of PL, at least for the particular orchard. These models can also be used for the prediction of range between wireless sensor network (WSN) nodes in orchards, since range can be defined as the distance over which the received power drops below the known sensitivity of the receiver. (C) 2012 IAgrE. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据