4.8 Article

An electrochemical aptasensor based on hybridization chain reaction with enzyme-signal amplification for interferon-gamma detection

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 36, 期 1, 页码 129-134

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2012.04.013

关键词

Interferon-gamma; Aptamer; Electrochemical sensor; Hybridization chain reaction

资金

  1. NSFC [21025521, 21035001, 21190041]
  2. National Key Basic Research Program [2011CB911000]
  3. CSIRT Program
  4. NSF of Hunan Province [10JJ7002]
  5. Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department [08A065]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel electrochemical aptasensor based on hybridization chain reaction (HCR) with enzyme-signal amplification was constructed for the detection of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma). In this aptasensor, the recognition probes which contained the sequence of IFN-gamma aptamer were initially binded to IFN-gamma. and the unbound recognition probes were captured on the electrode as an initiator to trigger the HCR. The two DNA hairpins bio-H1 and bio-H2 were opened by the recognition probe, and bound one by one on the electrode. The biotin was used as a tracer in the hairpins and streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase (SA-ALP) as a reporter molecule. Then, SA-ALP converted its electro-inactive substrate 1-naphthyl phosphate into an electroactive derivative 1-naphthol generating amplified electrochemical signal by differential pulse voltammetry (DPV). The activity of the immobilized enzyme was voltammetrically determined by measuring the amount of 1-naphthol generated for enzymatic dephosphorylation of 1-naphthyl phosphate. The electrochemical signal observed was inversely related to the concentration of IFN-gamma. The proposed approach showed a high sensitivity for IFN-gamma in a concentration range of 0.5-300 nM with a detection limit of 0.3 nM. The sensing system also provided satisfactory results for the detection of IFN-gamma in the cell media. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据