4.8 Article

Gold-coated silica-fiber hybrid materials for application in a novel hydrogen peroxide biosensor

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 34, 期 1, 页码 132-136

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2012.01.031

关键词

K-gold solution; Gold-coated silica-fiber; Core-shell hybrid nanostructure; Biosensor; Horseradish peroxidase; Hydrogen peroxide

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20925621, 20976054, 21176083]
  2. Special Projects for Nanotechnology of Shanghai [11nm0500800]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT0825]
  5. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [B502]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe the preparation and characterization of a novel type of core-shell hybrid material for application in a novel hydrogen peroxide biosensor, where the structure consists of a continuous gold shell that encapsulates the silica fiber. The SiO2@Au nanofibers had been synthesized by electrospinning silica sol, and then golden seeds were in situ grown on the fiber, lastly the gold-seeded silica fibers were further coated by continuous gold shells. The above nanocomposites had satisfactory chemical stability, excellent biocompatibility and efficient electron transfer property, which may have potential application for the highly sensitive chemical or biological sensors. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was used to evaluate the electrochemical performance of the SiO2@Au nanocomposites at indium tin oxide (ITO). The biosensor showed high sensitivity and fast response upon the addition of H2O2 and the linear range to H2O2 was from 5 x 10(-6) to 1.0 x 10(-3) M with a detection limit of 2 mu M (S/N =3). The apparent Michaelis-Menten constant of the biosensor was 1.11 mmol L-1. These results indicated that SiO2@Au nanocomposites have potential for constructing of a variety of electrochemical biosensors. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据