4.8 Article

Effect of influent nutrient ratios and hydraulic retention time (HRT) on simultaneous phosphorus and nitrogen removal in a two-sludge sequencing batch reactor process

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 100, 期 14, 页码 3506-3512

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.026

关键词

Sequencing batch reactor (SBR); Anaerobic-anoxic/nitrification (A(2)N); Denitrifying phosphorus removal organisms (DNPAOs); Nutrient ratios; Real-time control

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [50608064, 50628808, 50808004]
  2. Excellent Doctoral Dissertation Nationwide Foundation [200756]
  3. New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-08-0404]
  4. Center for Water Science
  5. Cranfield University
  6. State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource, China [PCRRK08006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A laboratory-scale anaerobic-anoxic/nitrification sequencing batch reactor (A(2)N-SBR) fed with domestic wastewater was operated to examine the effect of varying ratios of influent COD/P, COD/TN and TN/P on the nutrient removal. With the increased COD/P, the phosphorus removals exhibited an upward trend. The influent TN/P ratios had a positive linear correlation with the phosphorus removal efficiencies, mainly because nitrates act as electron acceptors for the phosphorus uptake in the A(2)N-SBR. Moreover, it was found that lower COD/TN ratio, e.g. 3.5, did not significantly weaken the phosphorus removal, though the nitrogen removal first decreased greatly. The optimal phosphorus and nitrogen removals of 94% and 91%, respectively were achieved with influent COD/P and COD/TN ratios of 19.9 and 9.9, respectively. Additionally, a real-time control strategy for A(2)N-SBR can be undertaken based on some characteristic points of pH, redox potential (ORP) and dissolved oxygen (DO) profiles in order to obtain the optimum hydraulic retention time (HRT) and improve the operating reliability. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据