4.5 Article

Application of adaptive DO-stat feeding control to Pichia pastoris X33 cultures expressing a single chain antibody fragment (scFv)

期刊

BIOPROCESS AND BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING
卷 35, 期 9, 页码 1603-1614

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00449-012-0751-z

关键词

Pichia pastoris; Constitutive protein expression; GAP promoter; Adaptive process control

资金

  1. Portuguese Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/36285/2007, SFRH/BD/43956/2008, SFRH/BD/36990/2007, SFRH/BPD/46277/2008, PTDC/EBB-EBI/103761/2008]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/EBB-EBI/103761/2008, SFRH/BD/43956/2008, SFRH/BD/36990/2007, SFRH/BPD/46277/2008, SFRH/BD/36285/2007] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, fed-batch cultures of a Pichia pastoris strain constitutively expressing a single chain antibody fragment (scFv) under the control of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAP) promoter were performed in a pilot 50 L bioreactor. Due to the very high cell density achieved within the first 75 h, typically between 140 and 160 g-DCW/L of dry cell weight (DCW), most of the scFv is produced under hard oxygen transfer limitation. To improve scFv productivity, a direct adaptive dissolved oxygen (DO)-stat feeding controller that maximizes glycerol feeding under the constraint of available oxygen transfer capacity was developed and applied to this process. The developed adaptive controller enabled to maximize glycerol feeding through the regulation of DO concentration between 3 and 5 % of saturation, thereby improving process productivity. Set-point convergence dynamics are characterized by a fast response upon large perturbations to DO, followed by a slower but very robust convergence in the vicinity of the boundary with almost imperceptible overshoot. Such control performance enabled operating closer to the 0 % boundary for longer periods of time when compared to a traditional proportional-integral-derivative algorithm, which tends to destabilize with increasing cell density.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据