4.5 Article

Coiled-Coil Response to Mechanical Force: Global Stability and Local Cracking

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 105, 期 4, 页码 951-961

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.05.064

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM05976]
  2. National Science Foundation [CCF-0833162]
  3. Welch grant [F-1783]
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1133351] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coiled coils are important structural motifs formed by two or more amphipathic a-helices that twist into a supercoil. These motifs are found in a wide range of proteins, including motor proteins and structural proteins, that are known to transmit mechanical loads. We analyze atomically detailed simulations of coiled-coil cracking under load with Milestoning. Milestoning is an approach that captures the main features of the process in a network, quantifying kinetics and thermodynamics. A 112-residue segment of the beta-myosin S2 domain was subjected to constant-magnitude (0-200 pN) and constant-direction tensile forces in molecular dynamics simulations. Twenty 20 ns straightforward simulations at several load levels revealed that initial single-residue cracking events (Psi > 90 degrees) at loads <100 pN were accompanied by rapid refolding without either intra- or interhelix unfolding propagation. Only initial unfolding events at the highest load (200 pN) regularly propagated along and between helices. Analysis of hydrophobic interactions and of interhelix hydrogen bonds did not show significant variation as a function of load. Unfolding events were overwhelmingly located in the vicinity of E929, a charged residue in a hydrophobic position of the heptad repeat. Milestoning network analysis of E929 cracking determined that the mean first-passage time ranges from 20 ns (200 pN) to 80 ns (50 pN), which is similar to 20 times the mean first-passage time of an isolated helix with the same sequence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据