4.7 Article

Theory and simulations of toroidal and rod-like structures in single-molecule DNA condensation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 142, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4914513

关键词

-

资金

  1. French Institut National du Cancer [INCa 5960]
  2. French Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-13-BSV5-0010-03]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H010106/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/H010106/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DNA condensation by multivalent cations plays a crucial role in genome packaging in viruses and sperm heads, and has been extensively studied using single-molecule experimental methods. In those experiments, the values of the critical condensation forces have been used to estimate the amplitude of the attractive DNA-DNA interactions. Here, to describe these experiments, we developed an analytical model and a rigid body Langevin dynamics assay to investigate the behavior of a polymer with self-interactions, in the presence of a traction force applied at its extremities. We model self-interactions using a pairwise attractive potential, thereby treating the counterions implicitly. The analytical model allows to accurately predict the equilibrium structures of toroidal and rod-like condensed structures, and the dependence of the critical condensation force on the DNA length. We find that the critical condensation force depends strongly on the length of the DNA, and finite-size effects are important for molecules of length up to 10(5) mu m. Our Langevin dynamics simulations show that the force-extension behavior of the rod-like structures is very different from the toroidal ones, so that their presence in experiments should be easily detectable. In double-stranded DNA condensation experiments, the signature of the presence of rod-like structures was not unambiguously detected, suggesting that the polyamines used to condense DNA may protect it from bending sharply as needed in the rod-like structures. (C) 2015 AIP Publishing LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据