4.2 Article

Density of Methanolic Alkali Halide Salt Solutions by Experiment and Molecular Simulation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING DATA
卷 60, 期 6, 页码 1614-1628

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/je5009944

关键词

-

资金

  1. Reinhart Koselleck Program of the German Research Foundation (DFG) [HA1993/15-1]
  2. Regional University Computing Center (RHRK) under Grant MSWS
  3. High Performance Computing Center Stuttgart (HLRS) [MMHBF2]
  4. Boltzmann-Zuse Society of Computational Molecular Engineering (BZS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The density of methanolic alkali halide salt solutions is studied experimentally at 298.15 K, 308.15 K and 318.15 K at 1 bar for solutions containing all soluble combinations of alkali cations (Li+, Na+, K+, Rb+, Cs+) with halide anions (F-, Cl-, Br-, I-) at concentrations up to 0.05 mol/mol or 90% of the solubility limit. The density of the electrolyte solutions is also determined by molecular simulation in the same temperature and composition range. The used force fields of the ions were adjusted in previous works to properties of aqueous solutions and the solvent methanol to pure component properties. The force fields are of the Lennard-Jones (LJ) plus point charge type in case of the ions and of the LJ plus partial charges type in case of the solvent. For the present molecular simulations, no further adjustment of the force fields is carried out. The mixed interactions between the ions and methanol are predicted by the LorentzBerthelot combining rules. The predictions of the reduced density by molecular simulation are found to be in very good agreement with the experimental data. Furthermore, the radial distribution function of methanol around the ions, the solvation number and the residence time of methanol molecules in the first solvation shell, the self-diffusion coefficient of the ions, and the electric conductivity are systematically studied by molecular simulation and compared to experimental literature data where available.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据