4.7 Article

Design and synthesis of novel bone-targeting dual-action pro-drugs for the treatment and reversal of osteoporosis

期刊

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 20, 期 6, 页码 2131-2140

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2012.01.024

关键词

Prostaglandin E-2; EP4 receptor; Agonist; Osteoporosis; Conjugates; Bone-targeting; Alendronic acid; Dual-action; Anabolic; Slow-release; Radiolabelled

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health - Institute for Musculoskeletal Health and Arthritis
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada
  3. British Columbia Government
  4. Merck Frosst Canada Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is an important medical need for effective therapies to redress the general bone loss associated with advanced osteoporosis. Prostaglandin E-2 and related EP4 receptor agonists have been shown to stimulate bone regrowth but their use has been limited by systemic side effects. Herein is described the design and synthesis of novel dual-action bone-targeting conjugate pro-drugs where two classes of active agents, a bone growth stimulating prostaglandin E-2 EP4 receptor subtype agonist (5 or 6) and a bone resorption inhibitor bisphosphonate, alendronic acid (1), are coupled using metabolically labile carbamate or 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid based linkers. Radiolabelled conjugates 9, 11a/b and 25 were synthesized and evaluated in vivo in rats for uptake of the conjugate into bone and subsequent release of the EP4 agonists over time. While conjugate 11a/b was taken up (9.0% of initial dose) but not released over two weeks, conjugates 9 and 25 were absorbed at 9.4% and 5.9% uptake of the initial dose and slowly released with half-lives of approximately 2 weeks and 5 days respectively. These conjugates were well tolerated and offer potential for sustained release and dual synergistic activity through their selective bone targeting and local release of the complimentary active components. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据