4.5 Article

Akt-mediated phosphorylation increases the binding affinity of hTERT for importin α to promote nuclear translocation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 128, 期 12, 页码 2287-2301

出版社

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.166132

关键词

Telomerase reverse transcriptase; Nuclear localization signal; Importin receptor; Akt; Phosphorylation

资金

  1. Bio and Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation - Korean Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning [NRF-2013M3A9B6076413]
  2. Yonsei University Internal Grant [2014-22-0096]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2012R1A2A2A01012830]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Telomeres are essential for chromosome integrity and protection, and their maintenance requires the ribonucleoprotein enzyme telomerase. Previously, we have shown that human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) contains a bipartite nuclear localization signal (NLS; residues 222-240) that is responsible for nuclear import, and that Akt-mediated phosphorylation of residue S227 is important for efficient nuclear import of hTERT. Here, we show that hTERT binds to importin-alpha proteins through the bipartite NLS and that this heterodimer then forms a complex with importin-beta proteins to interact with the nuclear pore complex. Depletion of individual importin-alpha proteins results in a failure of hTERT nuclear import, and the resulting cytoplasmic hTERT is degraded by ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis. Crystallographic analysis reveals that the bipartite NLS interacts with both the major and minor sites of importin-alpha proteins. We also show that Akt-mediated phosphorylation of S227 increases the binding affinity for importin-alpha proteins and promotes nuclear import of hTERT, thereby resulting in increased telomerase activity. These data provide details of a binding mechanism that enables hTERT to interact with the nuclear import receptors and of the control of the dynamic nuclear transport of hTERT through phosphorylation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据