4.7 Article

Drug targeting of airway surface liquid: A pharmacological MRI approach

期刊

BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY
卷 62, 期 6, 页码 410-419

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2008.01.004

关键词

trachea; magnetic resonance imaging; airway surface liquid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pharmacological MRI at 4.7 T was used to investigate the secretory response to Sylvestris pine oil stimuli in the rat airways, with the aim of developing an in vivo model in a small laboratory animal. The availability of such a model would greatly facilitate the drug discovery process using compounds active on airway surface liquid (ASL) production, and would make it possible to obtain information on chemoreceptoral mechanisms and to test the effects of environmental substances on the airways. T1- and T2-weighted images were acquired in the trachea and larynx before and at various times after exposure to pine oil. Several post-processing procedures were tested in order to improve the visibility of the secretory response and to measure the enhancement of the signal intensity of ASL. A semiautomatic application software was written to localize and to measure the volume involved in the secretory response to a compound administration. A significant effect of the pine oil administration on the secretory response was founded in trachea (p < 0.01) and in the salivary glands (p < 0.01). 3D reconstructions of MRI data and virtual endoscopy permitted a quick visualization of tracheal morphology and localization of the greatest response to stimulus. The study demonstrated that, despite technical problems due to the air/tissue interface and to the small dimensions of the experimental animals, the secretory response can be evaluated and the pharmacological MRI (phMRI) of the rat airways is feasible. The potential and the limitations of phMRI investigation in drug targeting of ASL are discussed. (c) 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据