4.3 Article

Sustained-release dexamethasone for the treatment of ocular inflammation and pain after cataract surgery

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY
卷 41, 期 10, 页码 2049-2059

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.11.005

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ocular Therapeutix, Inc., Bedford, Massachusetts, USA
  2. Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of dexamethasone as a sustained-release drug depot when placed in the canaliculus for the treatment of ocular inflammation and pain in cataract surgery patients. SETTING: Four private practice sites in the United States. DESIGN: Multicenter randomized double-masked clinical trial. METHODS: Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either the sustained-release dexamethasone or a placebo vehicle punctum plug inserted into the inferior distal canaliculus of the operated eye intraoperatively during cataract surgery. The primary endpoints were the proportions of patients with absence of cells or pain in the anterior chamber at 8 days. Secondary endpoints included cells, flare, pain, and the presence of the device at various timepoints through 30 days. RESULTS: Approximately one fifth (20.7%) of patients in the sustained-release dexamethasone group had an absence of anterior chamber cells at 8 days compared with 10.0% in the placebo group (P = .1495). A higher proportion of patients in the sustained-release dexamethasone group (79.3%) than in the placebo group (30.0%) had an absence of ocular pain at 8 days (P < .0001) and at all other timepoints (P < .0002). There were significantly higher proportions of patients in the sustained-release dexamethasone group than in the placebo group with an absence of anterior chamber cells, anterior chamber flare, and pain at several timepoints through 30 days (P <= .0251). CONCLUSION: Sustained-release dexamethasone provided elution of drug for up to 1 month after cataract surgery, providing clinically significant reductions in inflammation and pain. (C) 2015 ASCRS and ESCRS

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据