4.7 Article

Land use change in a biofuels hotspot: The case of Iowa, USA

期刊

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
卷 35, 期 6, 页码 2391-2400

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.047

关键词

Land use change; Economic analysis; Environmental Impact; Energy crop production; Corn-soybean rotation; Land set-aside

资金

  1. USDA-CSREES [2005-51130-02366, 2009-10002-05149]
  2. USDA-NIFA [2010-65400-20434]
  3. NSF [CDI CBET-0836607]
  4. USEPA [CR83371701-1]
  5. Nature Conservancy [C09-025-SIL-P]
  6. NIFA [581233, 2010-65400-20434] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study looks at the land use impact of the biofuels expansion on both the intensive and extensive margin, and its environmental consequences. We link economic, geographical and environmental models by using spatially explicit common units of analysis and use remote sensing crop cover maps and digitized soils data as inputs. Land use changes are predicted via economic analysis of crop rotation choice and tillage under alternative crop prices, and the Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) model is used to predict corresponding environmental impacts. The study focuses on Iowa, which is the leading biofuels hotspot in the U.S. due to intensive corn production and the high concentration of ethanol plants that comprise 28% of total U.S. production. We consider the impact of the biofuels industry both on current cropland and on land in the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), a land set-aside program. We find that substantial shifts in rotations favoring continuous corn rotations are likely if high corn prices are sustained. This is consistent with larger scale analyses which show a shift of the current soybean production out of the Corn Belt. We find that sediment losses increase substantially on the intensive margin, while nitrogen losses increase less. Returning CRP land into production has a vastly disproportionate environmental impact, as non-cropped land shows much higher negative marginal environmental effects when brought back to row crop production. This illustrates the importance of differentiating between the intensive and extensive margin when assessing the expansion of biofuel production. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据