4.7 Article

Measurement of the heat of smoldering combustion in straws and stalks by means of simultaneous thermal analysis

期刊

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 130-136

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.05.006

关键词

Reaction heat; Smoldering; STA; Agro-stalks: Triticum aestivum L.; Zea mays L.; Gossypium hirsutum L.; Setaria italica L.; Sorghum vulgare Pers.; Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam

资金

  1. National 863 project [2001AA514030]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50376031]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong [2004ZX21]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to investigate reaction heat of agro-stalks smoldering, wheat straw, corn stalk, cotton stalk, millet straw, sorghum stalk and sweet potato rattan powder were smoldered and pyrolyzed in a simultaneous thermal analyzer (STA). The samples were placed in a platinum crucible (empty set 5 mm x 5 mm) with a lid (with a emtpy set 1 mm hole) on a high-accuracy differential scanning calorimetry-heat capacity (DSC-cp) holder in the furnace of an STA and heated from 303 to 1073 K at a heating rate of 10 K min(-1). Sweeping gas with a flow rate of 25 ml min(-1) was air and nitrogen during smoldering and pyrolysis, respectively. Results showed that the heat emission characteristic of the smoldering process differed remarkably from the pyrolysis process. Based on the analysis of the DSC curves, oxidative polymer degradation heat and char oxidation heat were obtained from experimental data. It showed that the oxidative polymer degradation heat of the agro-stalks is more than 6.92 MJ kg(-1) consumed matter, higher than that of cellulose paper. And char oxidation heat is around 23 MJ kg(-1) consumed matter, similar to that of cellulose paper, but higher than that of cigarette. Total net heat emission of smoldering in STA was also obtained. These data can be used as reference data in analyzing smoldering of agro-stalks under similar conditions. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据