4.3 Review

Biomarkers of kidney injury

期刊

BIOMARKERS
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 S22-S30

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/1354750X.2011.587129

关键词

Acute kidney injury; acute renal failure; biomarker; NGAL; KIM-1; IL-18; NAG; Netrin-1; MCP-1

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Acute kidney injury (AKI) represents a common serious clinical problem. Up to date mortality due to AKI, especially in intensive care units, has not been changed significantly over the past 50 years. This is partly due to a delay in initiating renal protective and appropriate therapeutic measures since until now there are no reliable early-detecting biomarkers. The gold standard, serum creatinine, displays poor specificity and sensitivity with regard to recognition of the early period of AKI. Objective: Our objective was to review established markers versus novel urine and serum biomarkers of AKI in humans, which have progressed to clinical phase with regard to their diagnostic and prognostic value. Materials and methods: A review was performed on the basis of literature search of renal failure, acute kidney injury, and biomarkers in Pubmed. Results: Next to established biomarkers as creatinine and cystatin C, other molecules such as neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), monocyte chemotactic peptide (MCP-1), Netrin-1, and interleukin (IL)-18 are available and represent promising new markers that, however, need to be further evaluated in the clinical setting for suitability. Discussion: In clinical settings with incipient AKI, not only the development and the implementation of more sensitive biomarkers are required for earlier treatment initiation in order to attenuate the severity of kidney injury, but also equally important remains the substantial improvement and application of refined and prophylactic therapeutic options in these situations. Conclusion: Adequately powered clinical trials testing a row of biomarkers are warranted before they may qualify for full adoption in clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据