4.7 Article

Three-Dimensional Poly(ε-caprolactone) Bioactive Scaffolds with Controlled Structural and Surface Properties

期刊

BIOMACROMOLECULES
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 3510-3521

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bm300818y

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The requirement of a multifunctional scaffold for tissue engineering capable to offer at the same time tunable structural properties and bioactive interface is still unpaired. Here we present three-dimensional (3D) biodegradable polymeric (PCL) scaffolds with controlled morphology, macro-, micro-, and nano-mechanical performances endowed with bioactive moieties (RGD peptides) at the surface. Such result was obtained by a Combination of rapid prototyping (e g, 3D fiber deposition) and surface treatment approach (aminolysis followed by peptide coupling). By properly designing process conditions, a control over the mechanical and biological performances of the structure was achieved with a 1 capability to tune the value of compressive Modulus (in the range of 60-90 MPa, depending the specific lay-down pattern) The macromechanical behavior of the proposed scaffolds was not affected by surface treatment preserving bulk properties, while a reduction of hardness from 0.50-027 GPa to 0.1-0.03 GPa was obtained. The-penetration depth of the chemical treatment was determined by nanoindentation measurements and confocal microscopy The efficacy of both functionalization and the following bioactivation was monitored by analytically quantifying functional, groups and/or peptides at the interface. NIH3T3 fibroblast adhesion studies evidenced that cell attachment was improved suggesting a correct presentation of the peptide. Accordingly, the present work mainly focuses on the effect of the surface modification on the mechanical and functional performances of the Scaffolds, also showing a morphological and analytical approach to study the functionalization/bioactivation treatment, the distribution of immobilized ligands, and the biological features.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据