4.7 Article

Mechanism of Protein Release from Polyelectrolyte Multilayer Microcapsules

期刊

BIOMACROMOLECULES
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 1241-1247

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bm901450r

关键词

-

资金

  1. Institute of Materials Research and Engineering, A*STAR, Singapore [IMRE/08-IC0204]
  2. Queen Mary University of London
  3. NUS Graduate School for Integrative Sciences and Engineering (NGS) of National University of Singapore

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of polyelectrolyte multilayer microcapsules as a delivery system containing bioactive compounds strongly depends on understanding of the major factors that influence capsules' loading and release of incorporated substances. Mechanism of protein release from biocompatible polyelectrolyte multilayer microcapsules has been examined using two different approaches of protein encapsulation: (i) preloading via coprecipitation of tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC)-labeled bovine serum albumin (BSA) (TRITC-BSA) into CaCO3 particles followed by multilayer assembly and (ii) postloading of TRITC-BSA in preformed empty capsules templated on pure CaCO3 particles taken in the same amount as in preloading approach. Polysaccharides (alginate (Alg) or dextran sulfate (Dex)) and polyarginine (PAr) were used as layer constituents. On the basis of the effects of capsule shell composition and thickness, method of protein encapsulation, volume of the surrounding medium, and frequency of medium refreshment on protein release profile, we reveal a mechanism of protein release. The key phenomenon determining the protein release is the property of multilayer polyelectrolyte shells relating to the entrapping and accumulation of protein molecules. The results obtained together with the suggested mechanism of capsule loading and protein release allow us to propose the use of polyelectrolyte microcapsules as a depot system to supply and maintain a defined level of macromolecular drug concentration in surrounding medium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据