4.5 Article

Expression of the gene for mouse lactate dehydrogenase C (Ldhc) is required for male fertility

期刊

BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION
卷 79, 期 1, 页码 26-34

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.108.068353

关键词

capacitation; fertilization; gamete biology sperm; gene targeting; glycolysis; mouse; sperm capacitation; sperm motility and transport; testis

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD005863, R01 HD005863-35, HD05863] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) protein family members characteristically are distributed in tissue- and cell type-specific patterns and serve as the terminal enzyme of glycolysis, catalyzing reversible oxidation reduction between pyruvate and lactate. They are present as tetramers, and one family member, LDHC, is abundant in spermatocytes, spermatids, and sperm, but also is found in modest amounts in oocytes. We disrupted the Ldhc gene to determine whether LDHC is required for spermatogenesis, oogenesis, and/or sperm and egg function. The targeted disruption of Ldhc severely impaired fertility in male Ldhc(-/-) mice but not in female Ldhc(-/-) mice. Testis and sperm morphology and sperm production appeared to be normal. However, total LDH enzymatic activity was considerably lower in Ldhc(-/-) sperm than in wild type sperm, indicating that the LDHC homotetramer (LDH-C-4) is responsible for most of the LDH activity in sperm. Although initially motile when isolated, there was a more rapid reduction in the level of ATP and in motility in Ldhc(-/-) sperm than in wild-type sperm. Moreover, Ldhc(-/-) sperm did not acquire hyperactivated motility, were unable to penetrate the zona pellucida in vitro, and failed to undergo the phosphorylation events characteristic of capacitation. These studies showed that LDHC plays an essential role in maintenance of the processes of glycolysis and ATP production in the flagellum that are required for male fertility and sperm function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据