4.2 Article

The Outcome of Unrelated Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplants with Total Body Irradiation (800 cGy) and Cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg) in Adult Patients with Acquired Severe Aplastic Anemia

期刊

BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 101-108

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.06.014

关键词

Aplastic anemia; Unrelated allogeneic stem cell transplantation; TBI-based conditioning regimen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To verify the feasibility of 800 cGy of total body irradiation (TBI) with 120 mg/kg of cyclophosphamide (TBI-800/Cy-120) as a conditioning regimen for unrelated stem cell transplantation (u-SCT) in adult patients with severe aplastic anemia, we analyzed 50 consecutive patients who underwent u-SCT, including 26 patients from our previous pilot study. Seventeen patients received transplants from mismatched donors via high-resolution DNA typing (8 of 8). Thirty-eight patients received bone marrow and 12 peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus and short-course methotrexate. All patients achieved engraftment, and the median days of neutrophil and platelet recovery were 13 days and 20 days, respectively. The 5-year estimated overall survival was 88.0%. The cumulative incidences of acute grade II-IV GVHD (aGVHD) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD) were 46.0% and 50.3%, respectively. Only an HLA-mismatched donor was associated with the occurrence of aGVHD on multivariate analyses, whereas prior aGVHD and the use of PBSCs were associated with the occurrence of cGVHD on univariate analyses. In conclusion, the excellent outcomes of u-SCT with TBI-800/Cy-120 suggest that u-SCT may be applicable to patients with severe aplastic anemia even without prior treatment with immunosuppressive therapy, which will require testing in prospective trials in the future. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 17: 101-108 (2011) (C) 2011 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据