4.5 Article

Nestling erythrocyte resistance to oxidative stress predicts fledging success but not local recruitment in a wild bird

期刊

BIOLOGY LETTERS
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0888

关键词

oxidative stress; early-life conditions; local recruitment; fledging success; Parus major

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation
  2. Swiss NSF post-doctoral fellowship [PBBEP3_139396]
  3. Royal Society University Research Fellowship
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PBBEP3_139396] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stressful conditions experienced by individuals during their early development have long-term consequences on various life-history traits such as survival until first reproduction. Oxidative stress has been shown to affect various fitness-related traits and to influence key evolutionary trade-offs but whether an individual's ability to resist oxidative stress in early life affects its survival has rarely been tested. In the present study, we used four years of data obtained from a free-living great tit population (Parus major; n = 1658 offspring) to test whether pre-fledging resistance to oxidative stress, measured as erythrocyte resistance to oxidative stress and oxidative damage to lipids, predicted fledging success and local recruitment. Fledging success and local recruitment, both major correlates of survival, were primarily influenced by offspring body mass prior to fledging. We found that pre-fledging erythrocyte resistance to oxidative stress predicted fledging success, suggesting that individual resistance to oxidative stress is related to short-term survival. However, local recruitment was not influenced by pre-fledging erythrocyte resistance to oxidative stress or oxidative damage. Our results suggest that an individual ability to resist oxidative stress at the offspring stage predicts short-term survival but does not influence survival later in life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据