4.6 Article

Genome-wide analysis reveals downregulation of miR-379/miR-656 cluster in human cancers

期刊

BIOLOGY DIRECT
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6150-8-10

关键词

MiRNAs; Cluster; GBM; DLK1-DIO3; MEF2; Tumor Suppressor; Cancer

类别

资金

  1. Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR), India [NWP-0036]
  2. Department of Biotechnology (DBT), India [GAP-0094]
  3. ICMR-SRF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are non-uniformly distributed in genomes and similar to 30% of the miRNAs in the human genome are clustered. In this study we have focused on the imprinted miRNA cluster miR-379/miR-656 on 14q32.31 (hereafter C14) to test their coordinated function. We have analyzed expression profile of >1000 human miRNAs in >1400 samples representing seven different human tissue types obtained from cancer patients along with matched and unmatched controls. Results: We found 68% of the miRNAs in this cluster to be significantly downregulated in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), 61% downregulated in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC), 46% in breast invasive carcinoma (BRCA) and 14% in ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma (OV). On a genome-wide scale C14 miRNAs accounted for 12-30% of the total downregulated miRNAs in different cancers. Pathway enrichment for the predicted targets of C14 miRNA was significant for cancer pathways, especially Glioma (p<3.77x10(-6), FDR<0.005). The observed downregulation was confirmed in GBM patients by real-time PCR, where 79% of C14 miRNAs (34/43) showed downregulation. In GBM samples, hypermethylation at C14 locus (p<0.003) and downregulation of MEF2, a crucial transcription factor for the cluster was observed which likely contribute to the observed downregulation of the entire miRNA cluster. Conclusion: We provide compelling evidence that the entire C14 miRNA cluster is a tumor suppressor locus involved in multiple cancers, especially in GBM, and points toward a general mechanism of coordinated function for clustered miRNAs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据