4.7 Article

Effect of biosolids from municipal sewage sludge composted with rice husk on soil functionality

期刊

BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS
卷 49, 期 5, 页码 597-608

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00374-012-0748-4

关键词

Biosolids; Sewage sludge; Rice husk; Soil functionality; Soil quality indicators

资金

  1. Herambiente S.p.A. (Italy)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two different biosolids were obtained composting anaerobic (A) and aerobic (B) municipal sewage sludge (SS) with rice husk. Higher amounts of SS (1:1 v/v) could be used in this composting process than in conventional ones. The two biosolids were characterized by chemical analysis and compared with a conventional green manure plus municipal solid waste and municipal SS compost. The effect of these products on soil functionality was studied in a 14-week incubation experiment by their addition to two different soils (silty clay-Ustic Endoaquert-and sandy loam-Aquic Xeropsamment). The total organic C ranged from 20 to 26 % and total N from 1.6 to 2.5 % in the two biosolids. The most relevant difference was due to dissolved organic C that was lower in the anaerobic biosolid (1 mg C kg(-1)) than in the other products (5-6 mg C kg(-1)). The total trace elements (Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn) contents were under the limits fixed by the European legislation for soil application of SS (EC Directive 86/278/EEC, 1986). The three biosolids did not show strong negative effects on soil functionality during the incubation experiment, although some significant differences were found. The aerobic biosolid B mainly increased cumulative N release, microbial activity, basal respiration rate, microbial biomass-C-to-total organic C ratio, beta-glucosidase, alkaline phosphomonoesterase and aryl-sulphatase activities. The anaerobic one (B) decreased basal respiration rate, microbial biomass-C-to-total organic C ratio and aryl-sulphatase activity. DTPA soil bioavailable heavy metals were not affected by biosolids additions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据