4.7 Article

Earthworm burrowing behaviour in 2D terraria with single- and multi-species assemblages

期刊

BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS
卷 45, 期 8, 页码 789-797

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00374-009-0393-8

关键词

Earthworms; Ecological categories; Burrowing behaviour; 2D terraria; Interspecific competition; Commensalism

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [1319]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experiments were performed in 2D terraria to investigate the burrowing behaviour of different earthworm species from various ecological categories in single- and multi-species assemblages. The burrowing behaviour was quantified using image analysis software during a 2-week period. Terraria were found to reveal realistic impressions of the burrowing behaviour of various species according to the ecological classification of Bouch, into epigeic, endogeic and anecic species. Results of the study also permit the recommending of classifying various earthworms as intermediate species, e.g. Aporrectodea longa as endo-anecic and Lumbricus rubellus as epi-endogeic. Burrowing activity of endogeic species was significantly reduced in multi-species compositions compared to single-species treatments. Moreover, burrowing activity of Octolasion tyrtaeum was significantly reduced in the presence of Lumbricus terrestris compared to the specific single treatment. This endogeic species profited from the burrowing behaviour, e.g. bioturbation, of L. terrestris, and as such this is circumstantial evidence for commensalism (species interaction, in which one partner benefits while the other is unaffected) between anecic and endogeic earthworm species. Simultaneous burrowing activity of a combined assemblage of both endogeic species, Aporrectodea caliginosa and O. tyrtaeum, was also significantly reduced compared with the particular single treatments. Thus, this seems likely to be a response of interspecific competition and trophic niche separation between endogeic species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据