4.2 Article

Genetic architecture of the Tetragonula carbonaria species complex of Australian stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponini)

期刊

BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
卷 113, 期 1, 页码 149-161

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/bij.12292

关键词

hybridization; microsatellites; mitochondrial DNA; species complex; Tetragonula

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico - CNPq [PDE: 201470/2008-0]
  2. Australian Endeavour Awards Research Fellowship
  3. Australian Research Council
  4. [2008/08546-4 FAPESP]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A species complex is a group of closely related species whose ecological or morphological boundaries are sufficiently vague that delimiting one species from another is difficult. In Australia, a group of four stingless bee species Tetragonula carbonaria Smith, Tetragonula hockingsi Cockerell, Tetragonula mellipes Friese, and Tetragonula davenporti Franck - form a species complex in which gross morphology is clinal and overlapping. The species are most readily distinguished by the morphology of their brood combs. Here we genetically characterize bees sampled in areas where the species do and do not have contact. Our data corroborate previous evidence that T. hockingsi and T. carbonaria are genetically distinct and that there are two genetically distinct groups of T. hockingsi - one in the north and the other in the south of Queensland. Curiously, northern populations of T. hockingsi, which are allopatric to T. carbonaria, are genetically closer to T. carbonaria than are southern populations of T. hockingsi, which are in sympatry with T. carbonaria. We detected three hybrid colonies that appear to have arisen because of anthropogenic movement of T. hockingsi colonies from north to south of Queensland where males mated with local T. carbonaria queens. We discuss the status of T. davenporti, a recently described species cryptically similar to T. hockingsi from south-east Queensland. (C) 2014 The Linnean Society of London,

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据