4.2 Article

Wing shape, wing size, and sexual dimorphism in eye-span in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae)

期刊

BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
卷 98, 期 4, 页码 860-871

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2009.01326.x

关键词

aspect-ratio; insect-flight; moment-of-area; moment-of-inertia; sexual selection; wing-loading

资金

  1. NSF [IOB 0448060]
  2. DEB [0343617]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The eyes of stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae) are positioned at the end of rigid peduncles ('stalks') protruding laterally from the head. Eye-stalk length varies within the family and, in some species, varies between males and females. Larger eye-stalks in males result from sexual selection for longer stalks, a trait that increases male reproductive success. In the present study, we examined whether an increase in eye-stalk length results in an adjustment of wing size and shape to deal with the burden of bearing an exaggerated 'ornament'. We compared wing morphology among ten species of stalk-eyed flies that differ in eye-span and the degree of sexual dimorphism. Mass-specific wing length differed between males and females in seven out of the ten species. Nondimensional wing shape parameters differed between the species (P < 0.001), but mostly did not differ between males and females of the same species. Dimorphism in eye-span closely correlated with dimorphism in wing length (r = 0.89, P < 0.001) and the correlation remained significant (r = 0.81, P = 0.006) after correcting for phylogenetic relationships. Once corrected for phylogenetic relatedness, the mass-specific wing length of males (but not females) was weakly correlated with mass-specific eye-span (r = 0.66, P = 0.042). We propose that the observed proportional increase in wing length associated with increased eye-span can facilitate aerial manoeuverability, which would otherwise be handicapped by the elevated moment of inertia imposed by the wider head. (C) 2009 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2009, 98, 860-871.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据