4.2 Article

Parallels, nonparallels, and plasticity in population differentiation of threespine stickleback within a lake

期刊

BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
卷 98, 期 4, 页码 803-813

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2009.01318.x

关键词

adaptive divergence; ecological divergence; Gasterosteus aculeatus; structure; speciation

资金

  1. Icelandic Research Council
  2. University of Iceland Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The frequent occurrence of parallel phenotypic divergence in similar habitats is often evoked when emphasizing the role of ecology in adaptive radiation and speciation. However, because phenotypic plasticity can contribute to the observed pattern of divergence, confirmation of divergence at loci underlying phenotypic traits is important for confirming adaptive divergence. In the present study, we examine parallel morphological, neutral, and potentially adaptive genetic divergence of threespine stickleback inhabiting different habitats within a lake. Three genetic clusters best explained the neutral genetic structure within the lake; however, morphological differences were only weakly connected to genetic clusters and there was considerable phenotypic variation within clusters. Among the factors that could contribute to the observed pattern of morphological and genetic divergence are phenotypic plasticity, selective mortality of hybrids, and habitat choice based on morphology. Several loci are identified as outliers indicating divergent selection between the morphs and some parallels in morphological and adaptive genetic divergence are found in stickleback spawning at two lava sites. However, neutral genetic structure indicates considerable genetic connectivity among the two lava sites, and the parallels in morphology may therefore represent selective distribution of phenotypes rather than parallel divergence. (C) 2009 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2009, 98, 803-813.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据