4.7 Article

Reintroduction of Przewalski's horse (Equus ferus przewalskii) in Xinjiang, China: The status and experience

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
卷 177, 期 -, 页码 142-147

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.021

关键词

Asian wild horse; Reintroduction; Equus ferns przewalskii; China

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1303301]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences Visiting Professorships for Senior International Scientists Program [2011T1Z42]
  3. West Light Foundation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XBBS201308]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Przewalski's horse reintroductions to Xinjiang, China were initiated in 1985. Here, we present the first data on population development and current problems of the Przewalski's horse in both captive and released populations in Xinjiang. From 1985 to 2005, a total of 24 captive Przewalski's horses (14 males and 10 females) were brought from western zoos to the Jimsar Wild Horse Breeding Center (WHBC) in Xinjiang. In 1988, the first foal was born. Since then, a total of 285 foals have been born and the number of animals in the captive population continues to increase. In August 2001, the first group of horses was released into semi-wild conditions in the Kalamaili Nature Reserve (KNR). Released horses were allowed to range freely from spring to fall, but were driven into a winter coral to allow for supplemental feeding and to increase winter survival, and to reduce competition with domestic horses from local herdsmen who use the KNR as winter pasture. By December 2013, a total of 89 horses (32 males and 57 females) in 14 groups had been transferred to semi-release; and within two years after the first release, the first foal was successfully born in the wild. By 2013, the reintroduced animals had formed into 16 groups (127 individuals, 13 breeding and 3 bachelor group) in 5 sites. To date, this is the most comprehensive and successful Przewalski's reintroduction effort in China. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据