4.7 Article

Defining vegetation age class distributions for multispecies conservation in fire-prone landscapes

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
卷 166, 期 -, 页码 111-117

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.06.022

关键词

Biodiversity conservation; Fire; Fire mosaics; Management objective; Species diversity

资金

  1. Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment, Parks Victoria
  2. Glenelg Hopkins Catchment Management Authority

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The generation of heterogeneous fire mosaics is commonly advocated as a strategy for biodiversity conservation in flammable ecosystems, but it is usually unclear how mosaic properties link to biodiversity outcomes. Here we define a formal relationship between these elements and outline a method for determining the composition of fire mosaics defined by vegetation age classes that maximise species diversity. The method involves 1. quantifying species abundance in each of several previously defined vegetation age classes, and 2. using optimisation to determine the age class distribution that maximises species diversity. We applied the method to 135 species from four taxa in a southeastern Australian heathy woodland. In addition, we quantified the degree to which each taxa could act as a surrogate for others, and assessed how our chosen diversity metric changed with departures from the optimal distribution. Optimal age class distributions differed among taxa, and surrogacy relationships between most groups were poor. Departure from the optimal distribution resulted in an estimated decline in species diversity, a measure that may be used to quantify the biodiversity cost of alternative management strategies. Our measure of departure, relative entropy, was a strong predictor of diversity decline for some taxa but not for others. In cases where predictive capacity was strong, the rate of decline differed among groups. In flammable ecosystems our method can help determine fire management strategies empirically linked to a landscape-scale conservation objective. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据