4.7 Article

Enhancing stocks of the exploited limpet Patella candei d'Orbigny via modifications in coastal engineering

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
卷 143, 期 1, 页码 203-211

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.10.004

关键词

Microhabitat; Coastal urbanisation; Patterns of distribution; Limpet harvesting; Seawall; Azores

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/22009/2005]
  2. PRIMaRE
  3. NERC
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [mba010003] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. NERC [mba010003] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is widely recognised that microhabitats are important for a variety of marine organisms, yet this knowledge has rarely been applied in the construction of engineered structures as a means of enhancing biodiversity or populations of species at risk. Here we examined the influence of microhabitats on the distribution and survival of the exploited limpet Patella candei on natural shores before determining the effect of introducing such habitats to an artificial seawall. On natural shores individuals were associated with pits (a natural feature of volcanic rocky shores). Animals inhabiting pits showed reduced mortality and were smaller than those on open rock. Microhabitat utilisation was similar over the vertical range of distribution of A candei. Following observation of natural patterns, we applied this knowledge by experimentally drilling pits at varying densities and sizes in a seawall that had been constructed with simple topographical complexity. Overall, the number of animals increased in areas with experimentally increased microhabitat area. There was evidence that this was the result of immigration (larger animals) but also of increased recruitment. This study demonstrates one cost-effective way of conciliating the need to protect our coastlines while promoting the conservation and stock enhancement of over-exploited species. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据