4.7 Article

Dragonfly crisis in Japan: A likely consequence of recent agricultural habitat degradation

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
卷 142, 期 9, 页码 1899-1905

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.033

关键词

Endangered species; Expert opinion; Functional group; Odonata

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [20810011]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20810011] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many Japanese dragonfly species depend on habitat complexes maintained in rice paddy systems. We postulated that recent alterations to habitat complexes in paddy systems have had adverse effects on dragonfly populations, especially those 'once common species' that have come to depend primarily on paddy systems following losses of natural floodplain habitats. A high proportion of Japanese lentic dragonfly species depends on paddy fields or agricultural ponds that have been extensively degraded, while lotic species can often use both paddies and natural river systems. Thus we also postulated that lentic species are more susceptible to changes in agricultural habitats and are subject to higher extinction risks than lotic species. We aimed to extend previous work on estimating dragonfly extinction risk by developing mechanistic insights into the processes involved. Postulates were tested by analyzing relationships between (1) previous quantitative extinction risk assessments for dragonfly species and (2) species' ecological characteristics (i.e., distribution range and habitat type [lentic or lotic]). Lentic species were disproportionately represented among those with elevated extinction risk. Species with large distribution ranges were also subject to higher extinction risks than those with narrower ranges, reflecting a driving force acting at a national scale (i.e., intensive degradation of paddy systems). (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据