4.3 Article

Immunological characterization and mutational analysis of the recombinant protein BWp16, a major allergen in buckwheat

期刊

BIOLOGICAL & PHARMACEUTICAL BULLETIN
卷 31, 期 6, 页码 1079-1085

出版社

PHARMACEUTICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1248/bpb.31.1079

关键词

allergen; buckwheat recombinant protein; 2S albumin; cysteine residue; immediate hypersensitivity reaction

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare
  2. Food Safety Commission
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [18390043]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18390043] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Buckwheat allergy is one of the most critical diseases manifested by severe and dangerous symptoms in Japan and other countries. We previously isolated the cDNA encoding protein BWp16, a member of the 2S albumin family with a conserved motif of 8 cysteine (Cys) residues. Comparison of the deduced amino acid sequences of BWp16 and related proteins in the 2S albumin family showed similarities between BWp16 and BW 8-kDa from buckwheat, Ara h6 from peanuts and Ric c1 from castor bean. Purified recombinant BWp16 (rBWp16) expressed in Escherichia coli was recognized by >80% of sera from patients with positive for IgE binding to buckwheat. Mutational analysis of rBWp16 revealed that 7 out of 10 mutants in the Cys residues showed weaker IgE binding to patient's serum than wild-type rBWp16 (rBWp16 WT). Mutations of Cys65 and Cys66 in rBWp16 decreased the pepsin digestibility of the protein, and an ELISA inhibition assay revealed a weaker inhibitory effect of rBWp16 C65S than that of rBWp16 WT. These results suggest that the Cys residues, especially Cys65, are involved in the allergenicity of rBWp16. Our findings provide new evidence for the role of Cys residues in 2S albumin family proteins and open the door to the production of hypoallergens and application to safe diagnostic methods and allergen-specific immunotherapy of buckwheat allergy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据