4.7 Article

Dynamical modeling and multi-experiment fitting with PottersWheel

期刊

BIOINFORMATICS
卷 24, 期 18, 页码 2037-2043

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn350

关键词

-

资金

  1. HepatoSys initiative of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research BMBF [0313074D]
  2. Computational Systems Biology of Cell Signalling (COSBICS) [LSHG-CT-2004-512060]
  3. German Federal Ministry for Economy
  4. European Social Fund [BMWi, ESF, 03EGSBW-004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motivation: Modelers in Systems Biology need a flexible framework that allows them to easily create new dynamic models, investigate their properties and fit several experimental datasets simultaneously. Multi-experiment-fitting is a powerful approach to estimate parameter values, to check the validity of a given model, and to discriminate competing model hypotheses. It requires high-performance integration of ordinary differential equations and robust optimization. Results: We here present the comprehensive modeling framework Potters-Wheel (PW) including novel functionalities to satisfy these requirements with strong emphasis on the inverse problem, i.e. data-based modeling of partially observed and noisy systems like signal transduction pathways and metabolic networks. PW is designed as a MATLAB toolbox and includes numerous user interfaces. Deterministic and stochastic optimization routines are combined by fitting in logarithmic parameter space allowing for robust parameter calibration. Model investigation includes statistical tests for model-data-compliance, model discrimination, identifiability analysis and calculation of Hessian- and Monte-Carlo-based parameter confidence limits. A rich application programming interface is available for customization within own MATLAB code. Within an extensive performance analysis, we identified and significantly improved an integrator-optimizer pair which decreases the fitting duration for a realistic benchmark model by a factor over 3000 compared to MATLAB with optimization toolbox.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据