4.6 Article

Three-dimensional spatial patterns of trace gas concentrations in baseflow-dominated agricultural streams: implications for surface-ground water interactions and biogeochemistry

期刊

BIOGEOCHEMISTRY
卷 107, 期 1-3, 页码 319-338

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10533-010-9555-x

关键词

Greenhouse gases; Trace gases; Major ions; Surface-ground water interactions; Agriculture; Nitrogen acidification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Small streams that drain agricultural landscapes have come under close scrutiny as potentially significant indirect sources of greenhouse gases (GHGs) to the atmosphere. By exploring the stream-ground water connection in three dimensional space (horizontally and vertically beneath the stream channel, and longitudinally along the stream corridor) our results show (1) ground water can be a significant source of greenhouse gases to streams draining agricultural watersheds with concentrations in excess of atmospheric equilibrium by 221 mu mol C L-1 carbon dioxide, 0.64 mu mol C L-1 methane, and 0.65 mu mol N L-1 nitrous oxide (N2O); (2) changes in the stream-ground water connection can create seemingly erratic patterns in GHG concentrations over short longitudinal distances (order of meters); (3) soil-stream interfaces are hotspots for denitrification and methanogenesis; however, no significant N2O production was observed at such an interface under a riparian forest; and (4) nitrate (NO3 (-)) and N2O can be preserved as electron acceptors in oxic ground waters draining agriculture landscapes; hence, soil nitrification was the major source of N2O to stream water, with a legacy in ground water dating back to the 1960s; N2O tracked the seepage of NO3 (-) into surface waters. In this study, we demonstrate the utility of detailed measurements of multiple trace gases towards revealing spatial and temporal patterns of surface-ground water interactions and biogeochemistry across several small baseflow-dominated stream ecosystems in central Wisconsin, USA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据