4.6 Article

Identification of LPS-inducible genes downregulated by ubiquinone in human THP-1 monocytes

期刊

BIOFACTORS
卷 36, 期 3, 页码 222-228

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/biof.93

关键词

CoQ10; gene expression; inflammation; monocytes; LPS

资金

  1. KANEKA Corporation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coenzyme Q(10) (CoQ(10)) is an obligatory element in the respiratory chain and functions as a potent antioxidant of lipid membranes. More recently, anti-inflammatory effects as well as an impact of CoQ(10) on gene expression have been observed. To reveal putative effects of Q on LPS-induced gene expression, whole genome expression analysis was performed in the monocytic cell line THP-1. Thousand one hundred twenty-nine and 710 probe sets have been identified to be significantly (P <= 0.05) up and downregulated in LPS-treated cells when compared with controls, respectively. Text mining analysis of the top 50 LPS upregulated genes revealed a functional connection in the NF kappa B pathway and confirmed our applied in vitro stimulation model. Moreover, 33 LPS-sensitive genes have been identified to be significantly downregulated by Q(10)-treatment between a factor of 1.32 and 1.85. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis revealed for the Q(10)-sensitve genes a primary involvement in protein metabolism (e.g., HERC1 and EPS15), cell proliferation (e.g., CCDC100 and SMURF1), and transcriptional processes (e.g., CNOT4 and STK4). Three genes were either related to NF kappa B transcription factor activity (ERC1.), cytokinesis (DIAPH2), or modulation of oxidative stress (MSRA). In conclusion, our data provide evidence that Q(10) downregulates LPS-inducible genes in the monocytic cell line THP-1. Thus, the previously described effects of Q(10) on the reduction of proinflammatory mediators might be due to its antioxidant impact on gene expression. (C) 2010 International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. Volume 36, Number 3, May/June 2010, Pages 222-228 . E-mail: sek@molprey.uni-kiel.de

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据