4.5 Article

Glutamine induces nuclear degradation of the NF-κB p65 subunit in Caco-2/TC7 cells

期刊

BIOCHIMIE
卷 94, 期 3, 页码 806-815

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2011.11.012

关键词

Glutamine; Glutamate; NF-kappa B; pSer536 p65; IKK alpha; p38

资金

  1. La Ligue contre le Cancer (Comite de Seine Maritime, France)
  2. University of Rouen
  3. INSERM
  4. Regional Platform for Cell Imaging
  5. Conseil Regional de Haute-Normandie
  6. FEDER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the intestine, NF-kappa B is the main transcription factor involved in the anti-inflammatory effect of glutamine and we previously demonstrated that glutamine via its conversion to glutamate diminished the p65 protein content in Caco-2/TC7 cell nuclei without affecting the stimulating effect of IL-1 beta on NF-kappa B [21]. However, the molecular mechanism by which glutamine acts is not established. We therefore tried to identify such a mechanism. Our results demonstrate that glutamine decreased the intracellular NF-kappa B through the nuclear ubiquitin-proteasome pathway requiring therefore the nuclear translocation of the factor. Indeed, time-course study revealed that glutamine induced an increase in the nuclear p65 content within the first 15 min of culture, the p65 nuclear and cytosolic content decreasing gradually thereafter to reach 50 % of the control value after 60 min. This translocation was initiated by the phosphorylation of I kappa B alpha by the IKK beta subunit inducing its degradation and the p65 translocation. In parallel, glutamine activated the IKK alpha subunit which in turn phosphorylates p65 at Ser 536 which was responsible for p65 degradation by the nuclear proteasome. We also demonstrate that p38 MAPK lies between glutamine and the NF-kappa B pathway. In conclusion, this study identified for the first time the signaling pathway by which glutamine may protect against inflammatory conditions. (C) 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据