4.5 Review

The role of mast cell-derived secreted phospholipases A2 in respiratory allergy

期刊

BIOCHIMIE
卷 92, 期 6, 页码 588-593

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2010.02.030

关键词

Allergic inflammation; Asthma; Eicosanoids; Mast cells; Secreted phospholipases A(2)

资金

  1. Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Secreted phospholipases A(2) (sPLA(2)s) are molecules released in plasma and biological fluids of patients with systemic inflammatory, autoimmune and allergic diseases. These molecules exert proinflammatory effects by either enzymatic-mechanisms or through binding to surface molecules expressed on inflammatory cells. sPLA(2)s are released at low levels in the normal airways and tend to increase during respiratory allergies (e.g., rhinitis and bronchial asthma) as the result of local secretion. Several sPLA(2) isoforms are expressed in the human lung and some of them (e.g., group IIA and group X) are released in the airways of patients with rhinitis or asthma. Mast cells play a major role in the pathogenesis of respiratory allergies and other chronic inflammatory lung diseases. Recent evidence indicates that mast cells purified from human lung express most of the sPLA(2) isoforms so far described. IgE-mediated activation of these cells induce the release of sPLA(2)s suggesting that mast cells are a main source of extracellular sPLA(2)s during allergic reactions. Once released, sPLA(2)s may contribute to the generation of eicosanoids (e.g., PGD(2) and LTC4) and to the release of preformed mediators (e.g., histamine) by an autocrine loop involving the interaction of sPLA(2)s with surface molecules such as heparan sulphate proteoglycans or the M-type receptor. Thus, mast cell-derived sPLA(2)s may play an important role in the initiation and amplification of the inflammatory reactions in patients with allergic rhinitis and bronchial asthma. (C) 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据